For this event, the more likely reason may be that the border guards of the two countries is based on a different understanding of their territorial scope, crossed the boundaries of the "controversy", which led to the outbreak of conflicts. Who should and who, in fact, is not important. The problem is that since it is a "dispute", then certainly there has been to break the tacit understanding reached between the two sides, why at this time?
From India in the Ladakh region on April 30 problem of "tents confrontation" to convene the third flag talks, we can see that the Indian side of the goal is very simple, only the Chinese border guards to exit China and India in the disputed region, the recovery tent confrontation "pre-event" AS IS ", while China has put forward higher requirements: India stop to stop the development of new energy in the Ladakh region of the dispute. It can be that the eve of the meeting of prime ministers of the two countries need some kind of atmosphere, but also in some respects pick open, so that the results reached in the talks.
And, it is not the same as always, the Department of Foreign Affairs did not conflict "resolutely opposed" and "strong protest", nor summoned each other's ambassador.
Calm compared with China, India can be described as a fight. Indian military senior officials to the investigation of the disputed area, the Government of India and the army to intervene directly in the conflict, make every effort to seek dialogue and cooperation through the two countries at all levels of the existing pipeline. In particular, the Government of India in 1962, the two sides in the conflict appears to be very stubborn this is quite the overall situation concessions for political talks between the two countries signed an agreement in a timely manner vintage jewelry, to maintain the stability and tranquility of the border.
Sino-Indian conflict dense fog, but it is evident that it is not the border guards of both sides impulse to, but a political decision, and therefore political end. Analysis shows that China has changed the strategy and tactics in international exchanges has always been "putting aside disputes", "Low", and become more proactive and positive, intensification of the surrounding conflicts in other countries seems to be more "provocative".
Disputes with India is just part of the conflict surrounding Recently can be said is a "beacon over and over". Especially in the Diaoyu Islands, Huangyan Island dispute, China and Japan and the Philippines, the role reversal, making the original conflict to provoke the party to become a "victim", while China had become a "troublemaker". They turn to protest. A variety of signs that, the tent confrontation "event, China has also become the accused party.
From the Chinese border in the disputed region in a short period of time suddenly "everywhere", billowing smoke signals, the accidental Kongfei. The diplomatic incidents, often some kind of refraction of the domestic affairs. Empowerment of the people to govern the lack of legitimacy and credibility of the government are inadequate, and social injustice and growing inequality, people questioned at the same time, China's economy is also unable to break through the bottleneck of theory and polity obstacles, it is difficult to reproduce the high-speed development of the past situation, which will lead to a series of political and social crisis.
In order to achieve long-term rule, new leaders after he took office, the highly publicized "China Dream", trying to get those who live unhappy, forget the suffering of this world, in the hope that the next life or live a better life in the future, in a dream "to achieve "and" to meet their goals.
They also do everything possible to expand from two aspects governing resources, to lay a solid foundation to govern, to enhance the ruling force.
First, the two do not deny, to reconcile the left and right of the dispute, and incorporated Bo Xilai incident left uneasy. In the after Bo Xilai event, not only shocked senior sustained impact of this event, and to support its leftist in China a strong foundation and a wide range of believers. Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, a statistics show that China left after the centrist, as high as 38.1%, far more than the right-wing of 30 percentage points. New generation regarded as capital resources by virtue of the new ruling.
Nationalism into the mainstream discourse. The external advocate a strong nationalist and left-wing mob tendency often merge to form the forces to be reckoned with. The actual situation shows that those in power is to please these two kinds of people, carefully trying to incorporate them into their own under the wings, and the right-wing quietly be suppressed, making the turn to the left is becoming one of the trends of the Chinese society as a whole.
Diplomacy highest pursuit of the national interest. Well, China's foreign strategy turned to meet or to achieve national interests you?
Under this policy-driven China's peripheral diplomacy friction significantly increased conflict significantly enhanced, which will inspire conflict countries and China jointly deal with China, India and Japan is that this rapidly approached, the ASEAN countries more united in dealing with the conflict in the region also demonstrates this point. Ideologically conservative and left tendency leather, also trapped in isolation.
Countries highly dependent on globalization, the long run national interests will suffer.